| |
|
|
| |||||||
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
1st June 2008, 09:25
| #16 | |||||||||||
| Banned  Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Brisbane,QLD
Posts: 940
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0 
|  This tower has a really nice design and I cant get over how good it will look once completed the lantern is like the Icing on the cake. | |||||||||||
|  |
|
1st June 2008, 14:01
| #17 | |||||||||||
| Senior Member  Join Date: May 2008 Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 264
Thanks: 86
Thanked 25 Times in 13 Posts
Rep Power: 1
| I can't get over how big it is compared to Aurora. Right now Aurora looks enourmous - this thing is so much taller and fat as a sumo. Makes Aurora look like it should never have left its mother  People seem to think fat = bad. I disagree. It *can*, but doesn't in this case. | |||||||||||
|
| |
|
5th June 2008, 13:12
| #18 | |||||||||||
| Banned Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Brisbane,QLD
Posts: 940
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
| Yeah I just love the picture! | |||||||||||
|
| |
|
5th June 2008, 13:23
| #19 | |||||||||||
| Senior Member   Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 125
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Rep Power: 2
| that render is a bit too generous. Its 48m taller then Aurora . Aurora is 80% of trilogys height.
__________________ Sydney-City of villages...lol | |||||||||||
|
| |
|
8th June 2008, 02:06
| #20 | |||||||||||
| Banned Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Brisbane,QLD
Posts: 940
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
| Lol I know. But don't forget in those renders trilogy is seen closer than Aurora. Also triology is much wider and lit up. | |||||||||||
|
| |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
![BRISBANE - U/C [Demolition Works] Trilogy Tower 70st/255m/Mixed Use](http://www.skyscraperlife.com/iconimages/construction-updates/brisbane-u-c-demolition-works-trilogy-tower-70st-255m-mixed-use_ltr.gif)
Linear Mode
