Page 13 of 30 FirstFirst ... 39101112131415161723 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 65 of 147

Approved» Regent, Hilton-Wintergarden Redevelopment: (40F/158m/Office)

haha smart state im a proud queenslander but what they ]

  1. #61
    bne123's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD, Greatest Country on Earth
    Posts
    237
    Liked
    0 times
    Rep Power
    0

    Default


    haha smart state
    im a proud queenslander but what they are doing right now isint smart
    the Regent theater is dead in the 70s when the original theater was destroyed.
    I support them saving the foyer but just having a cinema i believe is wasting one of the most expensive piece of block in the CBD

    •   Alt
 
  • #62
    SoulVision's Avatar
    New Urbanist

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
    Posts
    3,482
    Liked
    2 times
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Locke View Post
    I was at the Regent the other day, the foyer is magnificent.

    It's a real crime that they smashed the actual theatre down, what a waste. Nothing like a grand old big cinema. They must have been out of their minds:



    In a perfect world I'd like them to reconstruct the theatre as it was, they do this all the time in Europe, why not here? Reconstruct the theatre and then let the developer build their tower around it, maybe given them some height concessions and other relaxations to compensate. I'm all for redeveloping most of the site but feel that we can do that AND include the old theatre. It is just a question of will.

    Whilst this proposal does have a lot of great aspects, the fact remains that the cinema heritage in a functionality sense will be lost for good (granted it presently is pretty rubbish with the 70's theatres), but it still carries on a certain function. Being reduced to a hall way for middle aged business men to walk through is hardly an optimum outcome.

    So the redevelopment represents a great opportunity to fix past wrongs. Rebuild the old cinema. It can be done, it's not a herculean task like flying to the moon. Then we can still do the rest of the cool modern stuff around that, if anything it's just a challenge for the architects.
    If I were a billionaire, I would pay to replicate the theatre myself... but unfortunately without being a billionaire, its financially inviable, for a developer too.

  • #63
    bne123's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD, Greatest Country on Earth
    Posts
    237
    Liked
    0 times
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    but even we have the money
    we need the original plan of the theater
    anyone know if the council keeps a plan for these commercial buildings as a record?

  • #64
    Banned

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,QLD
    Posts
    875
    Liked
    0 times
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    umm yeah there would be some sort of law that they have to keep them for so many years im sure.

  • #65
    KJBrissy's Avatar
    Stop Traverston Dam!!!!

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    CBD, Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,669
    Liked
    0 times
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    Height corrected.

  • Page 13 of 30 FirstFirst ... 39101112131415161723 ... LastLast

    LinkBacks (?)

    1. 30th September 2010, 14:38
    2. 28th May 2009, 12:33
    3. 23rd February 2008, 23:44
    4. 21st February 2008, 05:27

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •  
    SkyScraperLife.Com © 2006-2013

    World Building Database

    Download: Fast, Fun, Awesome - Web Stats